Securities Attorney for Going Public Transactions

Securities Lawyer Blog

knowledge itself is power

SEC Publishes Sample Comment Letter Regarding XBRL Disclosure

Back in June, 2018, the SEC adopted the Inline XBRL requirements (see HERE) and since that time almost all new disclosure rules require either XBRL tagging or Inline XBRL.  In December 2022 a new law was passed requiring the SEC to “establish a program to improve the quality of the corporate financial data filed or furnished by issuers under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”),” causing the SEC to focus even more on XBRL use.  As a result, in September 2023, the SEC published a sample letter to companies regarding their XBRL disclosures.

The sample letter consists of six comments, which I have included in full below followed by a short commentary on the point.

  1. Your filing does not include the required Inline XBRL presentation in accordance with Item 405 of Regulation S-T. Please file an amendment to the filing to include the required Inline XBRL presentation.

Item 405 details the content format and submission requirements for Inline XBRL.  The Rule is extremely technical and in reality both reporting companies and counsel rely on professional EDGAR agents to provide substantive assistance in ensuring compliance with the rule.

  1. The common shares outstanding reported on the cover page and on your balance sheet are tagged with materially different values. It appears that you present the same data using different scales (presenting the whole amount in one instance and the same amount in thousands in the second).  Please confirm that you will present the information consistently in future filings.

This comment is self-explanatory.  The element presented is technically tagged as “EntityCommonStockSharesOutstanding” and appears on the cover of Forms 10-Q, 10-K, Form 20-F, and Form 40-F.

  1. Disclosure under Regulation S-K Item 402(v) must be in Inline XBRL, in accordance with Item 405 of Regulation S-T and the EDGAR Filer Manual. Please ensure that you have provided the appropriate Inline XBRL tagging for all the required Item 402(v) data points.

Item 402 of Regulation S-K is part of the Pay vs. Performance rules adopted in August, 2022 – see HERE.  For the second time since the adoption of the rule, the SEC recently published guidance via new compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) – see HERE.  The SEC previously published 15 C&DI on the subject in February 2023 – see HERE.

  1. Refer to the [relationship disclosures] graph. Although it is permissible to combine one or more sets of relationship disclosures under Regulation S-K Item 402(v)(5) into one graph, table, or other format, note that you must still provide separate XBRL tags for each required item.  Please ensure that you have provided the appropriate Inline XBRL tagging for all the required Item 402(v) data points.

Comment 4 is also directed to the Pay vs. Performance rules.

  1. You have used different XBRL elements to tag the same reported line item on the income statement from period to period. Please provide us your analysis as to how you concluded that the results reported necessitated the change in the element.  Alternatively, if you conclude that the change from period to period was not necessary to communicate a change in the nature of the line item, confirm that you will ensure that your choice remains consistent for line items from period to period.

An XBRL element is a code for which information is tagged.  The element could be a number such as the EntityCommonStockSharesOutstanding mentioned above, but it also can be indicative of other information such as a date (“DocumentPeriodEndDate”), a form type (DocumentQuarterlyReport), a name (EntityRegistrantName), address (EntityIncorporationStateCountryCode), or just about any other information which lends itself to comparative analysis and for which a code could be assigned, and which appears in periodic reports.

  1. We note that instead of using an XBRL element consistent with current U.S. GAAP in your income statement, you instead used a custom tag. Custom tags are to be used by filers when an appropriate tag does not exist in the standard taxonomy.  See Item 405(c)(1)(iii)(B) of Regulation S-T.  Please tell us why the current U.S. GAAP tag is not applicable, or alternatively revise your disclosure, beginning with your next filing, to correctly tag this disclosure.

Again, this comment relates to technical requirements for which industry participants generally rely on a qualified EDGAR agent for assistance.

Gayatri Gupta