Securities Attorney for Going Public Transactions

Securities Lawyer Blog

knowledge itself is power

SEC Gains Final Judgement Against Patrick Churchville Involved In Ponzi-Like Scheme

The US District Court for the District of Rhode Island took action against ClearPath Wealth Management, LLC, by entering a final judgment and issuing a permanent injunction on March 29, 2024. 

The Final Judgment and the permanent injunction indicate that ClearPath Wealth Management, LLC, is guilty of defrauding the funds it advised and investors of those funds. 

Brief History: Rhode Island-based Investment Advisor Defrauding Investors 

In December 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) filed a complaint claiming that private fund manager Patrick Churchville (the “Defendant) through his firm ClearPath Wealth Management, LLC (the “Defendant”): 

  1. misappropriated funds raised from new investors to pay the old investors 

  2. used proceeds from selling particular investments to pay unrelated investors 

  3. used investors’ funds as collateral for loans to make investments benefitting the Defendants personally

  4. misappropriated funds from other investors to repay the loans 

  5. converted investor funds into investments for the Defendant’s benefit rather than using them for the investors’ benefit

  6. embezzled $2.5 million of investor funds to purchase Patrick Churchville’s residence overlooking Narragansett Bay in Barrington, Rhode Island

  7. used deceptive acts and misleading accounting practices to conceal their fraud 

  8. prolonged the scheme to mislead investors regarding the status, worth, and disposition of their investments

Churchville’s Series Of Ponzi-like Transactions Resulting In Losses

Patrick Churchville and ClearPath misappropriated the cash of the private funds they managed through a series of Ponzi-like transactions. 

Churchville and ClearPath used private funds they managed and controlled as vehicles for their fraudulent scheme. These funds included ClearPath Multi-Strategy Fund I, L.P., ClearPath Multi-Strategy Fund II, L.P., ClearPath Multi-Strategy Fund III, L.P., and HCR Value Fund, L.P ( collectively, the “Relief Defendants”). 

The Ponzi-like transactions effected by Churchville and ClearPath involved diverting funds raised from new investors to give returns promised to the old investors rather than using them for the fund’s intended purpose.

The Defendants also used monies due to particular investors by either purchasing new investments or distributing funds to unrelated investors. 

Additionally, the Defendants used the assets of private funds to secure undisclosed borrowing and repaid these borrowed funds using cash due to investors. All such misappropriation and misallocation were done via a series of Ponzi-like transactions resulting in losses of at least $11 million. 

What Is a Ponzi Scheme? 

A Ponzi scheme is a type of investment fraud whereby the fraudulent investment advisors pay the current or existing investors using funds raised from the new investors. One of the characteristics typical of a Ponzi scheme is that the fraudulent fund managers promise no or little risk and high returns from the investment funds managed by them. 

As observed in the above case, Churchville solicited funds from new investors to pay returns promised to the existing investors instead of using funds for their intended purposes. Also, the investors didn’t receive returns on their investments as the Defendants misled them claiming that the investor returns were pending liquidation. 

The Federal Court Imposed Preliminary Injunction And Asset Freeze On The Defendants 

In July 2015, the SEC sought an emergency equitable relief, including a preliminary injunction, to address the ongoing misconduct of the Defendants. This injunction aimed to stop the Defendants from continuing their fraudulent activities, maintain the status quo, and preserve any remaining assets for the defrauded investors before the entry of the final judgment. The preliminary injunction claims to: 

  1. prohibit the Defendants from the ongoing violation of the Federal Securities laws 

  2. freeze all the assets held for the benefit of the Defendants 

  3. ask the Defendants to give an account of the investor funds and all the other assets in their possession 

  4. stop the Defendants from accepting new investments 

  5. prevent the Defendants from destroying the relevant documents 

  6. designate a receiver over the Defendants according to the Federal Rule of Procedure 66

  7. authorize the SEC to take expedited discovery to exert pressure on the Defendant

Further, the SEC required the Defendants to pay civil monetary penalties, Defendants’ ill-gotten gains, and prejudgment interest, and Relief Defendants ill-gotten gains along with prejudgment interest. 

SEC Securing Final Judgment Against The Defendants 

As per the Federal Court’s Final Judgment against the Defendants’ multi-million dollar Ponzi Scheme, ClearPath Wealth Management, LLC is permanently enjoined from violating the antifraud custody, and compliance provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Sections 206(1), (2), and (4) and Rules 206(4)-2, 206(4)-7, and 206(4)-8 of the Investment Advisors Act of 1940. Additionally, the final judgment demands ClearPath to pay, jointly and severally, with Churchville $22, 553, 095 in disgorgement and $4,577, 810 in prejudgment interest. Also, any amounts distributed by the Federal Court-appointed receiver or paid by Churchville as criminal restitution after the date of the final judgment will be deducted from the total amount paid in disgorgement and prejudgment interest. 

Key Takeaways For The Investors From The Case 

Considering the Churchville-led multi-million dollar Ponzi scheme, there are certain red flags that investors can look out for to identify Ponzi schemes. These include consistently high returns with little or no risk, difficulty receiving returns or cashing out investments, lack of transparency in terms of how investor funds are used, lack of audited financial statements, promises of guaranteed returns, unregistered sellers pitching investment funds, and investment funds not registered with the SEC. Thus, investors must go through an investment prospectus or disclosure statement before committing funds to investment alternatives. 


Gayatri Gupta